The call for entries for the 2014 Hillman Prizes is now open. The Hillman Prizes recognize outstanding achievements in socially conscious journalism in the following categories: 

1. Book (bound volumes and ebooks)

2. Newspaper Journalism (story or series/in print or online) 


3. Magazine Journalism (story or series/in print or online) 


4. Broadcast Journalism (story or series/at least 20 minutes in total package length) Open to television, web TV, radio, podcast, and documentary film.

5. Web Journalism (publication/story or series/multimedia media project) Open to blogs, computer-assisted reporting, new investigative tools, mapping, crowd sourcing, and other multimedia media projects. Entries should feature both text and visual components.

6. Opinion & Analysis Journalism (any medium) Includes all types of advocacy, opinion, commentary and analysis, normally short-form and/or frequent, regardless of medium. Open to newspaper and magazine columnists, TV and radio presenters, podcasters, blogs, and bloggers.

7. The Canadian Hillman Prize. Awarded for outstanding journalism published in a Canadian media outlet. 

All applications must be received by Jan 31, 2014, except applications for the Canadian Hillman Prize, which are due Jan 9, 2014. 

The prize is a $5000 honorarium and travel to New York City to receive the award.

Full application details here. 

The Best of the Week’s News

• A faith-healing sect in Idaho is killing children by withholding medicine for treatable infections.

• Kathryn Joyce investigates the abuse of Ethiopian adoptees in the United States.

• Historian Rick Perlstein explains why the Tea Party is nothing new in Republican politics.

• Spousal trauma: The military’s hidden mental health crisis

• Attention, non-fiction writers: the deadline for the J. Anthony Lukas Work-in-Progress Award has been extended until Dec 10, 2013. Enter to win $30,000 to help finish your book.

This is going to sound like a George Saunders short story, but it really happened.

As you may have heard, a man in Southern New Mexico was subjected to a series of increasingly invasive and degrading medical procedures to search for non-existent drugs in his lower GI tract, all because a police officer thought he was standing funny during a traffic stop. Chris Ramirez of KOB4, the local TV station that broke this story, investigates how a routine traffic stop turned into a forced colonoscopy. 

David Eckert’s nightmare began on January 2, 2013 with an incomplete stop at a stop sign on his way home from a WalMart in Luna County. The officer who pulled Eckert over thought he was clenching his buttocks suspiciously and obtained a warrant to perform an anal cavity search. 

Eckert was taken to a nearby hospital, but the doctor refused to perform the procedure, citing an obscure concept known as “ethics.” Undeterred, the officer took Eckert to Gila Regional Medical Center in neighboring Grant County (near Truth or Consequences). According to Eckert’s medical records, obtained by KOB4, the following indignities were visited upon him: 

1. Eckert’s abdominal area was x-rayed; no narcotics were found.

2. Doctors then performed an exam of Eckert’s anus with their fingers; no narcotics were found.

3. Doctors performed a second exam of Eckert’s anus with their fingers; no narcotics were found.

4. Doctors penetrated Eckert’s anus to insert an enema. Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert watched as doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found.

5. Doctors penetrated Eckert’s anus to insert an enema a second time. Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert watched as doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found.

6. Doctors penetrated Eckert’s anus to insert an enema a third time. Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers. Eckert watched as doctors searched his stool. No narcotics were found.

7. Doctors then x-rayed Eckert again; no narcotics were found.

8. Doctors prepared Eckert for surgery, sedated him, and then performed a colonoscopy where a scope with a camera was inserted into Eckert’s anus, rectum, colon, and large intestines. No narcotics were found.

As Eckert’s civil rights lawsuit puts it, “The colonoscopy targeted an area of the Plaintiff which is highly personal and private,” all because he was supposedly standing “with an erect posture,” “keeping his legs together.” Eckert didn’t consent to any of these procedures, but the hospital billed him anyway. He’s still gets bills for thousands of dollars, according to the lawsuit. 

Eckert’s lawyers say that the warrant was invalid because it was only good for Luna County and the Gila Medical Center is located in Grant County, and because the initial search lacked probable cause. The police justified the search of Eckert’s car on the grounds that their police dog, Leo, had “alerted” them to the presence of drugs in the vehicle, but no drugs were found. In 2012, Leo “alerted” officers to drugs in Eckert’s car during a traffic stop for a cracked windshield, but no drugs were found then, either, according to the lawsuit. 

How ‘bout that war on drugs, eh? 

The Best of the Week’s News:

• More than 50 people were arrested in downtown LA while protesting WalMart’s poverty wages.

• Three men, including a Rutherford County commissioner, have been indicted in Tennessee for allegedly torturing a man who sold them counterfeit Justin Bieber tickets.

• An innocent man in Arizona was subjected to an increasingly invasive series of medical procedures to look for drugs in his anus because a cop thought he was standing funny during a traffic stop.

• The mass shooting you probably didn’t hear about.

• Journalistic conundrum: How do you cover a compulsive liar in a position of power without spreading his lies?